This is in keeping with previous 'Slim' models – the PS4 Slim was 40 per cent smaller than the original PS4, while the PS3 Slim was 33 per cent slimmer than the standard PS3, 36 per cent lighter
11 votes, 91 comments. true. Well, it is sort of true that a PS2 and a PS3 slim is much cheaper than a PS3 fat but most people buy a PS3 fact that they can only use 2 PlayStation’s to play 5 generations of consoles and playing PS2 games in HD that haven’t been remastered or available on the PSN Store and I’m also thinking of buying a slim since the matte black looks so cool, compared to
The PS4 Slim, as its name suggests, weighs less and is 40% smaller than the original PS4 model. The design itself is similar, so it's not a complete departure and still fits very much within the
Our colleagues at Home Cinema Choice actually measured the audio jitter of the slim – which returned a figure of over 460ps – a world apart from the original PS3's 138ps. The audio in DVD
I got a SuperSlim and sold my original Slim on the local auction site. Whole upgrade cost about $50NZ. I swapped HDD's though, since I had a 7200RPM 750GB drive in the original Slim. I'm very happy with it. It's quieter than the Slim and the Blu-Ray drive seems quicker, but yeah, I haven't done side-by-side tests or anything.
The PlayStation 3 Super Slim weighs at least 25% less than the Slim due in part to the slot-loading Blu-ray drive being replaced with a top-load disc reader similar to the original PlayStation's, but with a sliding cover. Power consumption
. 108 14 216 334 68 241 41 175 391
is the ps3 slim better than the original
